Another reason I thought interesting for gas price increase is within it's distribution. Operators, truckers, and station owners all affect the price in gasoline. There is even a level of competition within stations. I was in a grocery store the other day waiting in line to check-out, when I read a sign that stated if you spend more than $100 at the store, you get $0.10 off per gallon of gas at their station. If you spend anything between $1-$99.99 you get $0.03 off per gallon. This seemed like a very good deal until I walked out to realize that their prices per gallon are about $0.04 higher than the gas stations down the street not affiliated with a grocery store. So, unless you spend over $100, you are actually paying more than the average. In reading the notice in the store, the text seemed so great and promising.
What I failed to do as a reader was take into account the context of the text. The distribution context of the text was in a good place for success. While waiting in a check-out line a customer is more likely to read something, rather than stop while in an aisle searching for food to read it. It is also the last thing that the customer is thinking about as they leave and get into their car. This text targets and catches an audience that is often in a hurry and enjoys finding savings.
No help from the constant reminder of driving a car, gas price increases continue to annoy and anger us as consumers. This is extremely understandable in todays economy, yet, why isn't it newsworthy the fact that deaths in American oil fields has risen sharply in the past 6 years? Perhaps by ignoring this, it seems that we are saying it's almost necessary for death tolls to increase in order to have a potential for lower gas prices in the U.S. After all, if we could get more oil from within the county, then it wouldn't matter much in this case that the value of the dollar has decreased.
No comments:
Post a Comment